The Australian digital‑advertising market is at a crossroads. Stricter privacy laws, a push for greater transparency and a growing appetite for “cookieless” solutions are forcing publishers to rethink their revenue engines. At the same time, the region’s dominant ad‑tech players—Google Ad Manager, The Trade Desk and Magnite—are tightening their grip on supply‑side platforms (SSPs) and header‑bidding ecosystems.
Enter Kevel, the San Francisco‑based, API‑first platform formerly known as Adzerk. By establishing a dedicated foothold in Sydney and hiring Chris Woodward — a veteran who steered product strategy at Xandr EMEA—Kevel is signaling that it wants to be more than a niche tool for developers. It’s positioning itself as a full‑stack, privacy‑first alternative that can sit beside, or even replace, the monolithic offerings that have long dominated Australian media.
If the company’s growth in the U.S. and Europe is any indicator, the move could sharpen competition for mid‑size publishers that are looking for flexible, developer‑friendly solutions without the overhead of a massive corporate bureaucracy.
A quick look at Kevel’s playbook
Kevel’s core product is a set of APIs that let publishers build custom ad‑serving, recommendation and monetisation experiences. Unlike traditional ad‑tech suites that bundle everything behind a UI, Kevel hands over the plumbing so developers can script exactly how inventory is priced, how creatives are delivered and how data flows between systems.
| Feature | What it means for publishers |
|---|---|
| API‑first architecture | Full control over ad logic, easy integration with existing tech stacks |
| Real‑time bidding (RTB) & header bidding support | Access to multiple demand sources while keeping latency low |
| Granular reporting & analytics | Custom dashboards that surface revenue‑critical metrics |
| Privacy‑by‑design | Built‑in consent handling and compliance with GDPR, CCPA and Australia’s Privacy Act |
| Scalable cloud infrastructure | Pay‑as‑you‑go pricing that grows with traffic spikes |
While Kevel’s offering isn’t brand‑new, its emphasis on developer autonomy aligns with a broader industry shift: publishers are tired of “black‑box” platforms that limit experimentation. The company’s recent funding rounds (a $150 million Series C in 2024) have already financed expansions into the UK and Germany, and the Australian launch appears to be the next logical step.
Meet the man steering the Australian push
Chris Woodward isn’t a newcomer to the ad‑tech arena. Before joining Kevel, he spent five years at Xandr (formerly AppNexus) as Director of Product Strategy for the EMEA region, where he oversaw the rollout of programmatic buying tools across Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Prior to that, Woodward held senior product roles at OpenX and even had a stint at a venture‑backed ad‑tech startup that focused on machine‑learning driven ad optimisation.
In a briefing with Kevel’s co‑founder and CEO, Woodward laid out his three‑point agenda for the Australian market:
- Localisation at speed – Build a small, highly technical team in Sydney that can iterate on the platform’s APIs in response to regional demand‑source quirks and privacy regulations.
- Partnership ecosystem – Align with Australian SSPs, data‑clean rooms and consent‑management platforms to give publishers a plug‑and‑play experience that still respects Kevel’s developer‑first philosophy.
- Education & community – Host “build‑your‑own‑ad‑stack” workshops and contribute to open‑source ad‑tech libraries, turning the Australian developer community into a hotbed for Kevel‑centric innovation.
Woodward’s résumé gives him credibility with both the technical crowd and the business side of publishing. “The Australian market is uniquely positioned at the intersection of high‑value premium inventory and a regulatory environment that rewards transparency,” he told reporters. “Our APIs allow publishers to stay in control of their data while still tapping into global demand.”
How the Aussie ad‑tech landscape is evolving
Australia’s digital‑media spend is projected to hit US$1.3 billion in 2026, according to eMarketer, with programmatic accounting for roughly 65 % of that total. Yet, the market remains fragmented:
- Legacy SSPs such as PubMatic and SpotX continue to dominate the programmatic supply chain, often bundling “full‑stack” services that can lock publishers into long‑term contracts.
- Google’s double‑play (Ad Manager for direct deals and AdSense for open‑exchange) still captures a sizable slice of premium inventory, especially among news sites.
- Privacy regulation is tightening. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has been vocal about the need for clearer consent mechanisms, and the upcoming “Privacy Act Amendment” slated for late‑2026 will demand more granular data‑handling practices.
In this context, Kevel’s API‑centric, privacy‑first model could appeal to a niche but growing segment of publishers that want to break free from the “one‑size‑fits‑all” approach. Smaller publishers, in particular, have historically been forced to rely on pre‑built solutions that either lack flexibility or demand steep integration costs.
Competitors react – what’s the response?
Kevel’s expansion isn’t happening in a vacuum. Two notable reactions have already surfaced:
- Magnite’s “Marketplace Plus” – The SSP announced an “Australia‑first” developer suite that mirrors Kevel’s API approach, promising “low‑latency custom bidding” for local publishers. While Magnite’s brand power is undeniable, its solution still leans heavily on a UI‑driven workflow that may feel restrictive to dev‑heavy teams.
- Google’s “Ad Manager for Developers” beta – Google has opened a limited beta that exposes certain Ad Manager functions via RESTful endpoints. The beta aims to attract developers who otherwise shy away from the platform’s complex UI. However, early testers note that the API coverage is still “patchy,” and the pricing model remains opaque for mid‑size publishers.
Both moves suggest that the “API‑first” narrative is gaining traction, and Kevel may have forced the giants to move faster. The real test will be whether Kevel can keep its platform flexible enough to accommodate Australia’s unique demand‑source mix while still delivering the same uptime guarantees that larger competitors boast.
Potential roadblocks and the path forward
No expansion is without its challenges. Here are the three biggest hurdles Kevel will need to clear:
- Talent acquisition in a competitive market – Sydney’s tech talent pool is hot, especially for engineers skilled in cloud‑native architectures and real‑time data pipelines. Kevel’s success hinges on assembling a capable team quickly enough to meet publisher onboarding timelines.
- Integrating with local demand sources – Australian SSPs and data providers often have bespoke APIs and compliance requirements. Building and maintaining those connectors could become a resource drain if not managed strategically.
- Scaling support for a geographically dispersed client base – While Kevel’s platform is built for global scale, providing 24/7 technical support in the Australian time zone will likely require a regional support hub—a costly but necessary investment.
Woodward appears aware of these challenges. He hinted at a hybrid model: “We’ll leverage our existing remote engineering talent for core product work, while establishing a lean, Auckland‑based “customer‑success” squad to handle on‑the‑ground support.” The approach mirrors a broader industry trend where companies blend offshore development with local client‑facing teams.
What does this mean for Australian publishers?
For many mid‑tier publishers, Kevel could serve as a “best‑of‑both‑worlds” solution: the flexibility of a self‑serve ad stack without the overhead of building a bespoke system from scratch. The platform’s “pay‑as‑you‑go” pricing model also aligns well with the seasonal traffic spikes common in Australian media—think surf‑season surf‑videos or holiday‑shopping guides.
A case study from a UK‑based news outlet, which switched to Kevel in 2023, showed a 12 % lift in eCPM after implementing custom header‑bidding rules that prioritized premium demand partners. If similar gains can be replicated locally, the financial incentive alone could be compelling.
Moreover, Kevel’s emphasis on privacy‑by‑design may help publishers steer clear of costly compliance pitfalls. By handling consent management at the API layer, the platform can automatically route non‑consented impressions to non‑personalised demand sources, keeping revenue flowing while respecting user preferences.
The bigger picture: API‑first could be the next frontier
The ad‑tech world has long been dominated by “point‑and‑click” platforms that hide complexity behind GUIs. As publishers become more technically proficient—and as data‑privacy norms demand clearer data pipelines—API‑first solutions are emerging as a natural evolution.
Kevel’s Australian entry is a litmus test for this shift. If the company can capture a meaningful slice of the market within its first year, it will validate the hypothesis that developers are ready to reclaim control over their monetisation stack. Conversely, if adoption lags, it could signal that the friction of moving away from entrenched UI‑driven platforms is still too high for most organisations.
Either way, the move injects fresh competition into a market that has, until now, been heavily consolidated. For the thriving Australian digital‑media ecosystem, that can only be good news.
Bottom line
Kevel’s appointment of Chris Woodward and the launch of a Sydney‑based hub marks a strategic push into a region ripe for ad‑tech disruption. By marrying an API‑centric product with a focus on privacy and local partnership, the company aims to give Australian publishers a credible alternative to the monolithic solutions from Google, Magnite and other entrenched players.
The success of this venture will hinge on Kevel’s ability to attract top technical talent, integrate smoothly with local demand sources, and deliver tangible revenue lifts for its early adopters. If it does, we may see a wave of “build‑your‑own” ad stacks spreading across the Antipodes—and perhaps a re‑balancing of power in the global ad‑tech arena.
Get in touch with our Adtech expert
