The streaming landscape has finally eclipsed traditional television in the United States, but the advertising side of that shift appears to be lagging behind. In a research brief released on March 19, 2026, TripleLift – a platform that positions itself as a “Creative SSP” – documented that 49 percent of connected‑TV (CTV) advertising still depends on conventional 15‑ and 30‑second spots originally built for linear broadcast. The study, titled “The Architecture of Attention: Why Nonstandard CTV Is the New Standard for Impact,” argues that the creative infrastructure underpinning CTV campaigns has not kept pace with the medium’s rapid audience growth.
Streaming overtakes linear TV, yet ad formats stay rooted in the past
According to Nielsen data, May 2025 marked the first time streaming services captured a larger share of U.S. viewing minutes than cable and broadcast combined. At the same time, ad‑supported streaming now accounts for 74.2 percent of total TV consumption, a figure that underscores how dominant the “free‑with‑ads” model has become for connected screens.
Global ad spend is following a similar trajectory. Forecasts from WARC predict that by 2030 CTV advertising budgets will outstrip those allocated to traditional television. Despite this clear momentum, TripleLift’s analysis shows that many marketers continue to rely on the same short‑form video spots that dominated the three‑network era, even though the technology now allows for richer, more interactive experiences.
“CTV is one of the fastest‑growing channels in media, but creatively it’s still operating like the three‑network era,” said Dave Helmreich, CEO of TripleLift. “The industry promised the best of TV and digital. Instead, we recreated traditional commercials in a new pipe.”
The performance upside of high‑impact CTV units
TripleLift’s research compared standard video placements with a suite of “high‑impact” formats that take advantage of the interactive capabilities of streaming platforms. These formats include pause‑over ads, overlay graphics, and native units that blend seamlessly with the surrounding content. The findings are striking:
- 33 percent higher brand recall when a high‑impact unit runs alongside a traditional CTV spot.
- 11 times the brand‑consideration lift versus industry averages.
- 76 percent boost in purchase intent for campaigns that mix multiple innovative formats.
Consumer sentiment mirrors the performance data. The study reports that 67 percent of viewers find these newer ad experiences more memorable than standard video, while 77 percent view pause ads as informative rather than intrusive. In short, the audience is receptive to creative experimentation—yet the industry’s adoption rate remains modest.
Why agencies keep leaning on legacy spots
The report points to a structural bottleneck rather than a lack of imagination. As streaming services rolled out ad‑supported tiers, many introduced proprietary ad formats tailored to their specific user interfaces. While these bespoke units can deliver strong results on a single platform, the absence of a common technical specification makes it difficult for advertisers and agencies to scale campaigns across the fragmented CTV ecosystem.
“Agencies are built to produce 15s and 30s,” said an executive quoted in the report. “Creative teams need formats that are easy to deploy across platforms.”
Without a unified set of standards, many marketers default to the safest option: the familiar 15‑second or 30‑second video that will run everywhere, even if it fails to leverage the full potential of the medium.
TripleLift’s answer: a creative‑first orchestration layer
TripleLift positions its platform as a solution to the infrastructure gap. By acting as a “Creative SSP,” the company claims to coordinate creative assets, audience data, supply pathways, and measurement metrics within a single, outcome‑driven workflow. Rather than treating creative as a static deliverable, TripleLift’s system dynamically adapts formats for CTV, open‑web inventory, and retail media.
“The goal is to move the industry beyond simply delivering impressions. Today’s ecosystem optimizes delivery,” Helmreich explained. “Our approach is to optimize impact.”
In practice, this means advertisers could design a single creative concept that auto‑formats into a pause‑over, an overlay, or a native unit depending on the publisher’s capabilities, while still feeding back performance signals to inform optimization.
What the shift could mean for advertisers and agencies
If the industry embraces a standardized, creative‑centric infrastructure, the upside extends beyond raw recall or purchase intent. Programmatic buying could become more granular, allowing media planners to bid on specific high‑impact units with the same confidence they have for traditional video inventory. Measurement frameworks would also evolve, offering clearer attribution for formats that historically fell outside standard viewability metrics.
For agencies, a unified creative layer could streamline production pipelines, reducing the need for multiple versions of the same ad. This could free up resources for strategic work rather than format‑specific tweaks, potentially lowering overall media waste.
The road to industry standards
Historically, digital advertising has only scaled when common specifications emerge—think of the adoption of VAST for video or the IAB’s guidelines for native ads. TripleLift’s report suggests that CTV is poised for a similar inflection point. As advertisers pour more budget into connected screens and publishers continue to experiment with interactive formats, pressure is mounting for a cross‑platform consensus.
The authors warn that without a coordinated effort, CTV risks replicating the shortcomings of linear TV—limited creative flexibility and fragmented measurement—rather than capitalizing on its inherent advantages.
“Streaming rebuilt television distribution.” “Now the industry must rebuild television advertising,” the report concludes.
Bottom line
TripleLift’s March 2026 study provides a data‑driven snapshot of a market in transition. While streaming now dominates U.S. viewing habits and ad‑supported models capture the majority of screen time, the creative side of CTV remains anchored to legacy TV formats. The research quantifies the performance lift possible with high‑impact units and highlights a clear demand from viewers for more engaging ad experiences.
The primary obstacle appears to be technical: a lack of standardized specifications that allow advertisers to scale innovative formats across the fragmented CTV landscape. TripleLift positions its orchestration platform as a bridge over that gap, but broader industry collaboration will likely be required to establish the common standards that have historically unlocked growth in digital advertising.
For brands and agencies looking to stay ahead of the curve, the takeaway is clear: the next wave of CTV success will be defined not just by where audiences are watching, but by how creatively those impressions are delivered.
Get in touch with our Adtech experts
