Five advertisers accounted for 57% of advertisements recorded alongside Australian insurance-related ChatGPT responses, according to research from Somantra, an AI search brand visibility platform based in Sydney. The study points to a concentrated advertising market in which insurance companies compete for visibility with businesses offering comparison services and unrelated digital tools.
Somantra analysed 34,279 ChatGPT responses to Australian insurance queries, recording 35,290 advertisements. Of those responses, 24,397, or 71%, contained at least one ad. Budget Direct, Jotform, Variant Group’s pdf.net, Consolidated Insurances and Finder together accounted for more than half of all recorded ads.
The findings provide an early snapshot of advertiser competition within conversational AI interfaces. For advertising teams, the results raise questions about how paid placement, category relevance and brand visibility are developing as consumers use generative AI tools to research financial products and compare insurance options.
Market Landscape
Budget Direct led the advertisers tracked by Somantra, with 7,029 ads, representing 19.9% of the 35,290 advertisements recorded. Jotform followed with 5,285 ads, or 15%, while Variant Group’s pdf.net accounted for 3,372 ads, or 9.6%. Consolidated Insurances recorded 2,611 ads, representing 7.4%, and comparison site Finder accounted for 1,791 ads, or 5.1%.
Together, these five advertisers represented 57% of the measured advertising volume. The distribution suggests that a relatively small group of businesses secured a substantial share of available advertising exposure during the study period.
The remaining market was considerably more fragmented. Somantra identified 39 advertisers that accounted for 31.9% of ads, with individual totals ranging from 100 to 999. Another 327 advertisers, representing 88% of the names identified, shared 11.1% of the ads. Of these, 89 appeared only once.
The advertiser mix is notable because it extends beyond insurance providers. A form builder, a PDF tool, a broker and a comparison site appeared among the five largest advertisers, alongside Budget Direct. This suggests that advertising around insurance queries may attract businesses seeking exposure to users researching related tasks, rather than exclusively companies selling insurance policies.
However, ad volume alone does not establish advertiser spending, market share by revenue or campaign effectiveness. The findings describe the distribution of observed advertisements, not the financial scale of each advertiser’s activity.
Advertising Frequency and Category Relevance
Somantra reported 103 ads for every 100 responses. One advertisement appeared in 43.5% of responses, two appeared in 23.5%, and three appeared in 4.1%. No response contained more than three ads, while 28.8% carried none.
These figures suggest that advertising was a recurring feature of the sampled answer pages, although exposure varied between queries. The distinction matters for advertisers assessing whether paid placement provides consistent visibility across conversational search experiences.
The research also identified a long tail of smaller advertisers, including local removalists, security companies, car dealers and trades businesses referencing specific Australian cities or states. Somantra identified 26 overseas businesses, including insurance companies from the United States and Canada.
Category relevance varied as well. According to the study, 33.2% of ads from smaller advertisers were associated with home and property topics, compared with 18.2% among larger advertisers. This finding raises questions about how advertisers align their campaigns with the subject of the underlying query, although the announcement does not explain the classification methodology in sufficient detail to establish why the difference occurred.
Strategic Outlook
For advertisers and agencies, the results highlight the need to distinguish paid visibility from inclusion in an AI-generated recommendation. An advertisement appearing alongside an insurance response does not necessarily mean the brand is cited in the answer or included in the options recommended by the system.
Somantra reported that Budget Direct was mentioned in 10% of responses but appeared on the page in 26.7% when its advertisements were counted. The difference illustrates how paid placements can increase a brand’s overall visibility beyond its reported rate of appearance in responses.
For AdTech companies, this creates a measurement challenge: advertising exposure, organic brand mentions and actual influence on consumer decisions are separate outcomes. Advertisers will need clearer reporting to determine whether paid visibility contributes to consideration, qualified traffic or conversions.
The study offers a snapshot rather than a definitive measure of the broader AI advertising market. Its long-term significance will depend on how inventory, advertiser participation and measurement practices evolve across conversational AI platforms.
Top Insights
- Concentrated ad volume: Five advertisers accounted for 57% of ads in Somantra’s dataset.
- Non-insurance brands compete: A form builder and PDF tool ranked among the five largest advertisers.
- Advertising was frequent: The study recorded 103 ads per 100 responses, although 28.8% of responses carried none.
- A fragmented long tail: Hundreds of smaller advertisers accounted for a relatively limited share of total ads.
- Visibility is not recommendation: Paid placement and brand inclusion in an AI-generated answer are distinct measures.
Get in touch with our Adtech experts
